Introduction
The HIV virus is a growing epidemic in South Africa . According to The Joint United
Nations Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAID) in 2011 5.6 million people living in South Africa carried HIV (16). HIV prevalence
rapidly grew from 1990-2001 (17) causing more deaths and a bigger public health
concern. The increase of HIV across South Africa
in 2001 changed from 15.3% to 17.3% in 2012 (17). The spread of HIV continues
to increase with transmission from mother to child (1-5). An estimated 360,000
children became infected by their mothers either during pregnancy, birth or
breastfeeding in 2010 (7). Children under the age of five have a higher risk of
death (1). Children have under developed
immune systems causing the diseases to severely attack their body (3).
Public health interventions have been in effect
to prevent the spread of the disease. One particular intervention uses
technology to promote HIV awareness (7-18). Short message service (SMS) is used
to encourage mothers with HIV (7-18). Mothers are sent two messages daily, one
reminding them to take their medication and the other with HIV facts (7-18).
The messages mothers receive include lengthy information, in English. The
intervention hopes to motivate mothers to continue treatment after doctor
appointments and create awareness of mother-to-child HIV transmission (4). According
to Cell-Life 80% of South African adults have access to a cell phone (15). Supporters
of the intervention believe that the increase of technology will assist in decrease
of mother-to-child HIV transmission (15). Being in a generation of technology,
SMS messaging may be successful in providing facts and reminders to mothers
(12); but the intervention lacks the awareness of the Social Cognitive Theory
and the Health Belief Model (6, 8, 11).
The Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) incorporates
personal and environmental factors (6). Direct communication from a peer role
model with mothers suffering from HIV limits their exposure to personal
information about the deadly disease (6, 9).
According to the Mother2Mother organization mothers are more likely to
take action when they can relate to another suffering woman (9). Education is limited to a number of South
Africans (13). South Africans who are unable to obtain education are not given
the opportunity to read the facts sent to them. Providing mothers with written
facts assumes they are behaviorally capable of reading (11). Aside from
education, women who are pregnant and suffering from HIV need additional
motivation. The Cues to Action component in the Health Belief Model (HBM)
believes that motivation is the foundation in getting individuals to take
action (8). SMS messaging intervention assumes that mothers will be motivated
by generic informational SMS messages. Without the understanding of social
influence, individual capability and personal health the intervention was
unsuccessful in engaging mothers. (6, 8, 11)
SMS Messaging Rejects Direct
Communication
SMS messaging hopes to promote individual
change and decrease the spread of HIV (4, 10). However, SMS messaging limits
face to face interaction. Strictly providing SMS messages to mothers isolates
them from building a one-on-one or group relationship (9). Individuals
receiving SMS messages are isolated from being part of the bigger picture. Observational learning describes that
behavioral changes are promoted by watching the actions and outcomes of others
(6, 8). Sending SMS messages with reminders and facts limits direct exposure to
the seriousness of HIV transmission. According to The National Cancer
Institute, people do not solely learn from their own experiences (11), exposure
to the experiences of mother’s in similar situations provides reassurance (6,
11).
The SMS messaging intervention negatively
changes mother’s feelings about their parenting (18). The intervention fails to
provide mothers with connection to mentors, health advocates or support groups
(9). According to the Social Cognitive Theory mothers hesitate to make changes
in their life when they are not exposed to credible role models (6, 11). The
intervention’s rejection of direct communication and support pushes mothers to
reject SMS messages and in turn the risk of HIV transmission continues (12).
Sending informational SMS messages does not
promote interactive learning (18). Sending mother SMS messages about support
group meeting time and locations can motivate them to want to meet someone in
their position (9). In addition, including testimonials of mothers suffering
from HIV can create a feeling of companionship for mothers. Providing support
groups and testimonials allow mothers to connect and share stories and facts
(9). Mothers will no longer feel alone or ashamed about their condition (9).
Unfortunately, SMS messaging decreases the chances of mother’s ability to
receive direct attention.
SMS Messaging Prediction of
Behavioral Capability Fails
Relying on SMS messages creates the
assumption that all mothers can read. The Social Cognitive Theory describes
Behavioral Capability as having the knowledge and skills to perform a behavior
(6). Informational SMS messages were sent in a narrative format, in English
(15). Not all South Africans read English, languages vary in different areas of
South Africa (15). The
language of the SMS messages sent to mothers failed to acknowledge a mother’s
education levels. Unfortunately, 13.6% of South Africans cannot read (16). The
intent of sending out reminders and SMS messages is to promote education and a
successful health intervention (3-5, 7). However, the intervention will be
unsuccessful if mothers cannot read (16). The hope to provide intervention
through the usage of a cell phone will fail when mothers who cannot read ignore
the SMS messages. As a result, mothers are not being educated on HIV and the
benefits of taking action. If mothers who cannot read are unaware of the
benefits they will not help themselves or their children. Mothers who do not
take action have a higher risk of passing on HIV to their children (18).
Behavioral Capability can be promoted by
sending pictures for mothers who cannot read (6). Creating awareness through pictures
can motivate mothers to get tested for HIV or continue to follow up with their
appointments. According to, GBC Health, “without treatment, the risk of a
mother transmitting HIV to her infant is estimated at 5-10% during pregnancy,
10-20% during labor/delivery, and 5-20% during breastfeeding” (7). Creating a
picture for mother’s to see the effect of HIV on their body can decrease the
chances of mother to child HIV transmission.
SMS Messaging Lacks Motivation
HIV disease requires special
attention (1-2). There is no clear correlation between the SMS messages
received and the actions mother take (4, 15). Behavior is an outcome of cues to
action (8); reminder SMS messages (4) and indirect contact lack words of
motivation. Mothers can choose to ignore the SMS messages or prolong from
taking their medication. On the other hand, there are mothers take the HIV
facts as all the knowledge they need to know (9). Mothers begin missing their
follow up appointments and stop attending support groups (9, 12). As more SMS
messages are sent out, fewer mothers feel obligated to receive extra help.
SMS messaging lacks interpersonal
connection (6) and recognition of additional health concerns. SMS messages are
being sent without the knowledge of a mother’s mental state. A mother’s
emotional state can negatively impact her acknowledgement of her HIV SMS
messages (14). The more distant the mother feels from her illness the less
likely she is to help herself and her child (14). More than 1,000 mothers give
birth to a baby with HIV each day (16). Pregnant women are at high risk for
experiencing depression (14). SMS messages primarily focusing on a mother’s HIV
can cause additional health risk including, suicidal thoughts, anxiety, stress
(14). Aside from potentially having HIV additional prenatal health risk by a
mother can affect a child’s development prenatal and postnatal (9-18). SMS
messaging intervention limits interaction to personal motivational messages to
promote effective lifestyle changes.
Conclusion
The Social Cognitive Theory and Health
Belief Model can be effective theories to further developing mother to child
HIV transmission (6, 8, 11). However, the SMS messaging intervention focuses on
HIV individuals as a group rather than individually. SMS messages sent two times daily to mothers
isolates mothers from connecting with others. Although messages include
reminders to take medication and HIV facts (15), the information sent is not
provided in their native language (18). Mothers who are uneducated are unable to
benefit from SMS messages regardless of how valuable the information is.
An effective cell phone SMS messaging approach
would consider observational learning; which provides mothers with a support
group to attend, or a personal contact that is aware of their condition and
daily life (6). The language within the text can contribute to the overall
outcome, providing specific, short facts in the language native to mothers is
more likely to get response from mothers. On the other hand, mothers who are
unable to read should be sent pictures. Pictures can open mother’s eyes to the
effects of HIV. Eye opening message will motivate them to take their medication
and follow up with their doctors’ appointments. Ultimately, SMS messages should
build a connection with mothers. Mothers should feel motivated to get treated
and protect their child. Messages should be personal by using family names and
specifics about the mother’s condition depending on their stage. Overall, the
intervention should address and include elements observational learning and
behavioral capability from The Social Cognitive Theory as well as personal
motivation to encourage mothers to act according to the Health Belief
Model. Excluding the Social Cognitive Theory and the Health Belief Model
will not influence mothers to treat their HIV, unfortunately leading to HIV
transmission to their child.
References
1. AVERT. HIV and AIDS in Africa. England: AVERT.
http://avert.org/hiv-and-aids-africa.
2. AVERT. HIV and AIDS in Africa. England: AVERT.http://www.avert.org/global-hiv-aids-epidemic.
3. Barron P. Eliminating
Mother-to Child Transmission in South Africa. World Health Organization 2012; 91: 70-74
4. Boakye K, Scott N, Smyth
C. Mobiles for Development. San
Francisco, CA: UNICEF, 2010.
5. Coovadia H.
Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV-1 Infection during Exclusive Breastfeeding
in the First 6 Months of Life: An Intervention Cohort Study. The Lancet 2007; 369:1107-1115.
6. Edberg M. Essentials of
Health Behavior: Social and Behavioral Theory in Public Health. Jones and Bartlett Publishers 2007;
35-49.
7. GBCHealth. Preventing Mother-to-Child Transmission of
HIV. Healthy Women, Healthy Economies. New York, NY: GBCHealth.
8. Marks D. Healthy
Psychology in Context. Journal of Health
Psychology 1996; 1:7-21.
9. Mothers2Mothers.
Empowered Mothers Nurture Healthy Families. Los Angel3es, CA: Mothers2Mothers.
http://www.m2m.org
10. Munkund Bahadur KC,
Murry PJ. Cell Phone Short Messaging Service (SMS) for HIV/AIDS in South
Africa. Stud Health Technol Inform
2010; 150:530-534.
11. National Cancer
Institute. A Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. National Cancer Institute 2005; 9-21.
12. Nyongesa H. HIV/AIDS
Information System Taps Cell Phone Texting Capabilities.: Microsoft Research: External Research Digital Inclusion Program
2007.
13. Puccio, J, Belzer M,
Olson J, Martinez M, Salata C, Tucker D, Tanaka D. The use of Cellphone
Reminder Calls for Assisting HIV-infected Adolescents and Young Adults to
Adhere to HAART. AIDS Patient Care STDS
2006; 20:438-444.
14. Rochat T, Bland R, Mark
T, Stein A. Suicide Ideation, Depression and HIV Among Pregnant Women in Rural
South Africa. Health; 5: 650-661
15. Tolly K, Alexander H.
Innovative use of Cellphone Technology for HIV/AIDS Behavior Change
Communications. Cell-Life 2009.
16. Joint United Nations
Programme on HIV/AIDS. Epidemiological
Status. Switzerland, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.
17. UNITAID. Prevention of
Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV. World
Health Organization, 2011.http://www.unaids.org/en/dataanalysis/datatools/aidsinfo/
18. Ybarra M, Bull S.
Current Trends in Internet and Cell phone Based HIV Prevention and Intervention
Programs. Current HIV/AIDS Report
2007; 4: 201-207.
No comments:
Post a Comment